Re: Compilation fail on FC13


Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
 

The downsides are the the build process (for core) is twice as long,
and that the implementation files may get longer. But I think it's
worth it to keep the code and associated tests together.

Thoughts?
I think thats fine, the DEBUG/TEST build would build both and the RELEASE wouldn't.

.malcolm


-- Jeremy


On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Alan Jones <sky...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, I dont believe there currently is a link dependency to boost.
Ahhh, my bad. In quick reading up on it I'd assumed that they were
referring to linking
with boost's libraries, rather than the test modules created within
the user's code.

I did a little more reading here
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/user-guide/usage-variants/dynamic-lib-variant.html

It seems that BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK can be specified in Makefiles instead. Perhaps
there's some logic that can be dropped into the CMakeLists.txt to
handle this transparently?

Cheers,

Alan.

Join ocio-dev@lists.aswf.io to automatically receive all group messages.