Re: reversable, but not 1D color transforms in config.ocio
Andrew Wood <andre...@...>
Cool, that's what I thought. Just making sure you hadn't snuck anything else in there I hadn't noticed! And yeah re: LAB space vs Log space for doing the actual sharpen --that's an interesting idea I'll have to look into that more for sure. I know that wide gamut devices will be here soon and we really can't be going off into l*a*b* and back to do this stuff. I'm starting with pipeline parity with what we do today, but I know there will be a whole bunch work to go back and move all of this to an aces workflow someday, and there's no room for this nonsense there. On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 1:42:27 PM UTC-8, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
|
|