Re: Question about IIF config
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
Marie,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for catching this! The currently shipping IIF configuration is based on an older specification (I forget the exact version, but it's around 8 months old), so my hope is the versions will explain the differences you are seeing. We've wanted to update to the latest RRT for awhile now, so let us take a stab at it and we'll see if it fixes everything. We will also take care to note in the profile which RRT version it is specifically, to help avoid ambiguity in the future. The noise (discontinuity) you are seeing in the 3d RRT lut is an artifact of how we originally generated this table, we'll make sure it's all fixed in the updated version. The AllocationTransform you mention describes a linear -> log transform (a perfect mathematical log operator), where the range from ( 2^-10.4739 , 2^5.52607) is rolled into (0.0-1.0) for sampling with a 3d lut. The lut was generated by taking a 3d lattice image (0-1) , unwarping it through the inverse of the transform, and then applying the analytical rrt. Thanks! -- Jeremy 2011/10/4 Marie Fétiveau <m...@...>: Hello all ! |
|