|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
I just pushed a change which switches back to setuptools as the distribute fork has long been merged back into setuptools.
I have also pushed the versions
I just pushed a change which switches back to setuptools as the distribute fork has long been merged back into setuptools.
I have also pushed the versions
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#1244
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
No hurry, unless 1.0.9 fixes a major bug...
If we're going to bundle something then a (non-beta) version of setuptools would be appropriate but an option to use the system installed version should be
No hurry, unless 1.0.9 fixes a major bug...
If we're going to bundle something then a (non-beta) version of setuptools would be appropriate but an option to use the system installed version should be
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1242
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Sorry in the middle of a house move. It was part of the python 3 pull request someone sent. I thought it was a requirement to get it to work with 3. Once I'm back up and running I'm happy to revert it
Sorry in the middle of a house move. It was part of the python 3 pull request someone sent. I thought it was a requirement to get it to work with 3. Once I'm back up and running I'm happy to revert it
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#1243
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Not sure why distribute was added. I'm very comfortable switching
back if we believe it to be appropriate.
-- Jeremy
Not sure why distribute was added. I'm very comfortable switching
back if we believe it to be appropriate.
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1240
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Jeremy,
Do you know why distribute was added? Looking at upstream it appears to be a depreciated fork of Setuptools.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/0.6.49
Thanks,
Richard
Jeremy,
Do you know why distribute was added? Looking at upstream it appears to be a depreciated fork of Setuptools.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/0.6.49
Thanks,
Richard
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1241
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
Hi!
Just tested and added a link to buildlog in #318 issue.
Hope it helps, somehow.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
Hi!
Just tested and added a link to buildlog in #318 issue.
Hope it helps, somehow.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
|
By
"Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv.d...@...>
·
#1239
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Haven't done any real testing, but the build completes with docs off.
Thanks,
Richard
Haven't done any real testing, but the build completes with docs off.
Thanks,
Richard
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1236
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/300
Thanks,
Richard
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/300
Thanks,
Richard
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1235
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Can you clarify what you mean by this? I'm not sure what the "pull 300
patch" refers to.
Yah, I'm seeing that too. Looks like the docs build target is hosed
for 1.0.9; looking into it...
Can you
Can you clarify what you mean by this? I'm not sure what the "pull 300
patch" refers to.
Yah, I'm seeing that too. Looks like the docs build target is hosed
for 1.0.9; looking into it...
Can you
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1232
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Ok, a couple of observations when trying to build for Fedora 19 x86_64
1. I was using the pull 300 patch which is still open. It looks like parts of it were committed, but not all of it. I don't think
Ok, a couple of observations when trying to build for Fedora 19 x86_64
1. I was using the pull 300 patch which is still open. It looks like parts of it were committed, but not all of it. I don't think
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1234
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/tree/v1.0.9
Will send a link from now on! :)
(Docs are in the process of rebuilding, the website will be updated
momentarily).
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/tree/v1.0.9
Will send a link from now on! :)
(Docs are in the process of rebuilding, the website will be updated
momentarily).
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1231
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
Hi again!
By
"Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv.d...@...>
·
#1238
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0.9 released
Guess I got there too quick, don't see it yet on github...
Also, although it's not difficult to find a link would be handy :)
Thanks,
Richard
Guess I got there too quick, don't see it yet on github...
Also, although it's not difficult to find a link would be handy :)
Thanks,
Richard
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#1233
·
|
|
OCIO 1.0.9 released
I've just tagged the latest OCIO master as 1.0.9. There had been a
bunch of bugfixes in there, and it had been hurting our distros to not
have a tagged release with the lates.
-- Jeremy
**Version
I've just tagged the latest OCIO master as 1.0.9. There had been a
bunch of bugfixes in there, and it had been hurting our distros to not
have a tagged release with the lates.
-- Jeremy
**Version
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1230
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
We've just put out the 1.0.9 tag. Please see if this fixes things?
We've just put out the 1.0.9 tag. Please see if this fixes things?
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1229
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
Oh - on further inspection I see you're compiling against yaml 0.5.1
This is a known issue, being tracked here:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/issues/318
-- Jeremy
<mfv.d...@...>
Oh - on further inspection I see you're compiling against yaml 0.5.1
This is a known issue, being tracked here:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/issues/318
-- Jeremy
<mfv.d...@...>
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1228
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
Hi!
Good to know ;-)
Well... I can test it, obviously ;-P
Gonna let you know the results of the build with that parameter set.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian
Hi!
Good to know ;-)
Well... I can test it, obviously ;-P
Gonna let you know the results of the build with that parameter set.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian
|
By
"Matteo F. Vescovi" <mfv.d...@...>
·
#1237
·
|
|
Re: Review: Nuke: OCIODisplay now has an implemented GPU path
Awesome, thanks Sean!
Does anyone on this list have experience working with the Nuke GPU
path? This API is new to us, and we'd love to get some experienced
eyes on this code. :)
-- Jeremy
Awesome, thanks Sean!
Does anyone on this list have experience working with the Nuke GPU
path? This API is new to us, and we'd love to get some experienced
eyes on this code. :)
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1227
·
|
|
Re: OpenColorIO FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD boxes
Thanks for this report.
It looks to be a symbol visibility issue related to our use of
yaml-cpp, so this is probably fixable by editing the top-level
CMakeLists file's "USE_EXTERNAL_YAML" section.
I
Thanks for this report.
It looks to be a symbol visibility issue related to our use of
yaml-cpp, so this is probably fixable by editing the top-level
CMakeLists file's "USE_EXTERNAL_YAML" section.
I
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#1226
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on layering of multiple config files
Hi,
Apologies for bumping an old discussion, but I'm in looking for a similar set of features to the ones Nathan described, and as the discussion seemed to have fizzled out, I wanted to show my
Hi,
Apologies for bumping an old discussion, but I'm in looking for a similar set of features to the ones Nathan described, and as the discussion seemed to have fizzled out, I wanted to show my
|
By
Mark Boorer <mark...@...>
·
#1225
·
|