|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Also worth mentioning... Although Toshio (from Fedora devel list)
thought it was strange for the python library to serve a dual purpose,
he agreed that the most appropriate action was to put the
Also worth mentioning... Although Toshio (from Fedora devel list)
thought it was strange for the python library to serve a dual purpose,
he agreed that the most appropriate action was to put the
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#676
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Usually it's the packagers job to decide on how to break up the
packages as the guidelines differ somewhat between distros, but
documented suggestions are very
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Usually it's the packagers job to decide on how to break up the
packages as the guidelines differ somewhat between distros, but
documented suggestions are very
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#674
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Off list Jeremy, Colin and myself were chatting about this when talking about the windows build.
....
We need to have a consensus on how the project will be split up into packages (ie different sets
Off list Jeremy, Colin and myself were chatting about this when talking about the windows build.
....
We need to have a consensus on how the project will be split up into packages (ie different sets
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#675
·
|
|
Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Placeholder for continued discussion from:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/183
Placeholder for continued discussion from:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/183
|
By
Richard <hobbe...@...>
·
#673
·
|
|
Review: Update library locations for multi-lib *nix systems
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/183
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/183
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#672
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
I did start to play around with using cpack for this to create the relevant installers (rpm, deb, tar, exe etc..) I should have some free time to get around to cleaning this up and committing
I did start to play around with using cpack for this to create the relevant installers (rpm, deb, tar, exe etc..) I should have some free time to get around to cleaning this up and committing
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#671
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
Awesome!
And now that I have a Windows machine available, once we get the
process sorted out I'm happy to post pre-built installers (mac,
windows, linux?) for each dot release.
--
Awesome!
And now that I have a Windows machine available, once we get the
process sorted out I'm happy to post pre-built installers (mac,
windows, linux?) for each dot release.
--
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#669
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
Hi there -
If no one else beats me to it I'll try to put together a fork of the project that should work out of the box on Windows together in the next week or two along with some pre-built binaries
Hi there -
If no one else beats me to it I'll try to put together a fork of the project that should work out of the box on Windows together in the next week or two along with some pre-built binaries
|
By
Colin Doncaster <colin.d...@...>
·
#670
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
Hi guys!
Just want to second that some more windows-friendly documentation/
precompiles would really be appreciated. Not very experienced in this,
but I`m trying to compile thru cygwin and I am almost
Hi guys!
Just want to second that some more windows-friendly documentation/
precompiles would really be appreciated. Not very experienced in this,
but I`m trying to compile thru cygwin and I am almost
|
By
Ivar Rystad <iv...@...>
·
#668
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
Yes, 1.0.1.
1.) I saw errors that patch is not a recognized program. (As Colin
mentioned I downloaded cygwin and put it on the path).
2.) Finding the OCIO_USE_BOOST_PTR Cmake setting cleared out
Yes, 1.0.1.
1.) I saw errors that patch is not a recognized program. (As Colin
mentioned I downloaded cygwin and put it on the path).
2.) Finding the OCIO_USE_BOOST_PTR Cmake setting cleared out
|
By
Paul Hudson <phuds...@...>
·
#667
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0 Build Issues On Snow Leopard
This works like a charm now!
Thanks,
Jordan
This works like a charm now!
Thanks,
Jordan
|
By
Jordan Soles <jor...@...>
·
#666
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
As far as I know, Windows should be building right out of the box. I
presume you're using 1.0.X, correct?
Colin's email you cite below is from May. In August, the Foundry
committed 2 changes should
As far as I know, Windows should be building right out of the box. I
presume you're using 1.0.X, correct?
Colin's email you cite below is from May. In August, the Foundry
committed 2 changes should
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#665
·
|
|
Re: Pre-built libraries/examples for Windows?
Hi all,
I'm resurrecting this thread to see about the current state of
building OCIO for Windows.
I was able to get Cmake to generate a VS 2008 solution, but it isn't
compiling.
Colin's list of fixes
Hi all,
I'm resurrecting this thread to see about the current state of
building OCIO for Windows.
I was able to get Cmake to generate a VS 2008 solution, but it isn't
compiling.
Colin's list of fixes
|
By
Paul Hudson <phuds...@...>
·
#664
·
|
|
Re: OCIO 1.0 Build Issues On Snow Leopard
I've just rolled this patch into master. Jordan / dbr, please let me
know if you encounter any further issues on Lion.
-- Jeremy
I've just rolled this patch into master. Jordan / dbr, please let me
know if you encounter any further issues on Lion.
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#663
·
|
|
Re: Question about IIF config
Marie,
I am VERY late to the party but a linear spaced 32 or 64 segment lut from aces to a ssrt/odt will be insufficent.
You can create a ACES ADX-> rrt/odt 32 or 64 lut and get acceptable results.
Marie,
I am VERY late to the party but a linear spaced 32 or 64 segment lut from aces to a ssrt/odt will be insufficent.
You can create a ACES ADX-> rrt/odt 32 or 64 lut and get acceptable results.
|
By
Joseph Slomka <jsl...@...>
·
#662
·
|
|
Re: Question about IIF config
A fix for this was just committed to master:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/177
Please let me know if you have any other compatibility issues with 3dl export.
-- Jeremy
A fix for this was just committed to master:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/177
Please let me know if you have any other compatibility issues with 3dl export.
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#661
·
|
|
Review: ociobakelut improvements
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/178
Added options for specifying simple color corrections (such as
saturation, offsets, etc) in addition to normal lut commands. Also
allow for
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/178
Added options for specifying simple color corrections (such as
saturation, offsets, etc) in addition to normal lut commands. Also
allow for
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#660
·
|
|
Review: 3dl export shaper lut now matches 3dlut size
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/177
Previously, flame and lustre 3dl export was hard-coded to size 17
shaper luts, even when the cubelut was a different size (33x33x33 for
lustre, for
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/177
Previously, flame and lustre 3dl export was hard-coded to size 17
shaper luts, even when the cubelut was a different size (33x33x33 for
lustre, for
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#659
·
|
|
OCIO 1.0.1 released
Version 1.0.1 (Oct 31 2011):
* Luts with incorrect extensions are properly loaded
* ocio2icc / ociobakelut get --lut option (no longer requires ocio config)
* DisplayTransform looks do not
Version 1.0.1 (Oct 31 2011):
* Luts with incorrect extensions are properly loaded
* ocio2icc / ociobakelut get --lut option (no longer requires ocio config)
* DisplayTransform looks do not
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#658
·
|
|
Re: Question about IIF config
This feels like a bug (not having the shaper lut obey the specified size).
If I remember correctly (the last time I tested at least) flame only
supportex size 17 luts, so even if we make the fix it
This feels like a bug (not having the shaper lut obey the specified size).
If I remember correctly (the last time I tested at least) flame only
supportex size 17 luts, so even if we make the fix it
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#657
·
|