|
Re: Development Priorities?
Thanks for all the feedback, everyone! It has been very helpful.
Having tabulated the results, the winner - by a landslide - is documentation!
So this will be the (rough) order of development:
1)
Thanks for all the feedback, everyone! It has been very helpful.
Having tabulated the results, the winner - by a landslide - is documentation!
So this will be the (rough) order of development:
1)
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#122
·
|
|
Re: Compilation fail on FC13
Hi Jeremy,
shared_ptr is header only and you're already using CMake, so perhaps
it'd be worth
looking at using CMake's unit testing instead of boost's?
This way there's no linking dependencies
Hi Jeremy,
shared_ptr is header only and you're already using CMake, so perhaps
it'd be worth
looking at using CMake's unit testing instead of boost's?
This way there's no linking dependencies
|
By
Alan Jones <sky...@...>
·
#126
·
|
|
Re: Compilation fail on FC13
Actually, I dont believe there currently is a link dependency to boost.
ldd src/core/libOpenColorIO.so :
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff63afb000)
libstdc++.so.6 =>
Actually, I dont believe there currently is a link dependency to boost.
ldd src/core/libOpenColorIO.so :
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff63afb000)
libstdc++.so.6 =>
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#125
·
|
|
Re: Compilation fail on FC13
Hi Jeremy,
Ahhh, my bad. In quick reading up on it I'd assumed that they were
referring to linking
with boost's libraries, rather than the test modules created within
the user's code.
I did a little
Hi Jeremy,
Ahhh, my bad. In quick reading up on it I'd assumed that they were
referring to linking
with boost's libraries, rather than the test modules created within
the user's code.
I did a little
|
By
Alan Jones <sky...@...>
·
#127
·
|
|
Re: Compilation fail on FC13
Ok, so I just checked in a bunch of changes to the unit testing (spi
github repository). These changes may or may not affect the build
error you've gotten. I'll check your error on OSX when I get
Ok, so I just checked in a bunch of changes to the unit testing (spi
github repository). These changes may or may not affect the build
error you've gotten. I'll check your error on OSX when I get
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#128
·
|
|
OCIO 0.6.0 posted
Version 0.6.0 (Sept 21 2010):
* Start of 0.6, "stable" branch
All 0.6.x builds will be ABI compatible (forward only).
New features (even experimental ones) will be added to the
Version 0.6.0 (Sept 21 2010):
* Start of 0.6, "stable" branch
All 0.6.x builds will be ABI compatible (forward only).
New features (even experimental ones) will be added to the
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#129
·
|
|
Re: Compilation fail on FC13
I think thats fine, the DEBUG/TEST build would build both and the RELEASE wouldn't.
.malcolm
I think thats fine, the DEBUG/TEST build would build both and the RELEASE wouldn't.
.malcolm
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#130
·
|
|
3D lut size and bit depth questions
Hi All,
I recently started using OpenColorIO and I have some questions:
In my current code, I'm using a 32x32x32 lut, just for the display,
not for processing.
Is it a good size? How do you choose a
Hi All,
I recently started using OpenColorIO and I have some questions:
In my current code, I'm using a 32x32x32 lut, just for the display,
not for processing.
Is it a good size? How do you choose a
|
By
Est <rame...@...>
·
#131
·
|
|
Re: 3D lut size and bit depth questions
Est,
A 32x32x32 cube lut is a totally reasonable size, it's what we happen
to use internally at Imageworks.
Some other popular sizes include 17x17x17 (flame), and 33x33x33 (a few
commercial color
Est,
A 32x32x32 cube lut is a totally reasonable size, it's what we happen
to use internally at Imageworks.
Some other popular sizes include 17x17x17 (flame), and 33x33x33 (a few
commercial color
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#132
·
|
|
[imageworks/OpenColorIO] 776393: added comment
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO
Commit: 77639305a291d929b257bb1b3211462b8c9428ed
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO
Commit: 77639305a291d929b257bb1b3211462b8c9428ed
|
By
nor...@...
·
#133
·
|
|
Re: 776393: added comment
Testing, 1 2 3...
I've updated our github acct. so all pull requests get cc'd to this
list.
I really like how OpenImageIO reviews commits in their public dev
forum before adding them to the repo,
Testing, 1 2 3...
I've updated our github acct. so all pull requests get cc'd to this
list.
I really like how OpenImageIO reviews commits in their public dev
forum before adding them to the repo,
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#134
·
|
|
Re: 776393: added comment
Oops. This is actually a callback on commits themselves, not pull
requests. I'll disable the callback until I get it worked out.
Oops. This is actually a callback on commits themselves, not pull
requests. I'll disable the callback until I get it worked out.
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#135
·
|
|
Re: 3D lut size and bit depth questions
Hi Jeremy,
Thank you for your replies.
Everything is clear now.
I think that the lut size is an implementation detail of the client
and a recommended lut size function wouldn't have much use
as most
Hi Jeremy,
Thank you for your replies.
Everything is clear now.
I think that the lut size is an implementation detail of the client
and a recommended lut size function wouldn't have much use
as most
|
By
Est <rame...@...>
·
#136
·
|
|
[imageworks/OpenColorIO] 5a24dc: bump
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO
Commit: 5a24dca1b81c5275051b769adeaef6c634a10e1d
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO
Commit: 5a24dca1b81c5275051b769adeaef6c634a10e1d
|
By
nor...@...
·
#137
·
|
|
OCIO 0.6.1 posted
Version 0.6.1 (Oct 5 2010):
* Exposed ExponentTransform
* Added CineonLogToLinTransform - a simple 'straight-line'
negative
linearization. Not strictly needed (could be done previously
Version 0.6.1 (Oct 5 2010):
* Exposed ExponentTransform
* Added CineonLogToLinTransform - a simple 'straight-line'
negative
linearization. Not strictly needed (could be done previously
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#138
·
|
|
Inital Houdini lut support
Hi,
I have a few emails to send through I have been discussing with jeremy, I have split them up so they can be discussed in different threads.
Here is an initial pass at the Houidini lut loader. I
Hi,
I have a few emails to send through I have been discussing with jeremy, I have split them up so they can be discussed in different threads.
Here is an initial pass at the Houidini lut loader. I
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#143
·
|
|
ICC Support
I have been playing with littlecms a little (building profiles for photoshop etc) and was wondering if people have an idea on how they envisioned these fitting into OCIO?
There could be reader and
I have been playing with littlecms a little (building profiles for photoshop etc) and was wondering if people have an idea on how they envisioned these fitting into OCIO?
There could be reader and
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#144
·
|
|
XML Profile Format
Are people super into the idea of using xml?
We used xml for nearly everything at RSP, over time it became clear that it's a pretty poor choice for a lot of things.
One of the developers introduced
Are people super into the idea of using xml?
We used xml for nearly everything at RSP, over time it became clear that it's a pretty poor choice for a lot of things.
One of the developers introduced
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#145
·
|
|
Development Guidelines + New Website
Now that we've got a few people actively contributing code, we're
going to start formalizing the development process. (Thanks to Malcolm
Humphreys for being the guinea-pig in the process).
Please
Now that we've got a few people actively contributing code, we're
going to start formalizing the development process. (Thanks to Malcolm
Humphreys for being the guinea-pig in the process).
Please
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#139
·
|
|
Review: pkg-config support and some OCIO_VERSION changes
I wanted some pkgconfig (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pkg-config) support to make it easier to build against OCIO.
Part of this needed burning the ocio version into the .pc file, so I rejigged things
I wanted some pkgconfig (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pkg-config) support to make it easier to build against OCIO.
Part of this needed burning the ocio version into the .pc file, so I rejigged things
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#146
·
|