|
Build error on CentOS 7.5
Hi,
I'm using a CentOS 7.5 (3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64) docker instance to build ocio with devtoolset-6 and my build fails with the following
Hi,
I'm using a CentOS 7.5 (3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64) docker instance to build ocio with devtoolset-6 and my build fails with the following
|
By
noizf...@...
·
#1735
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
Thumbs firmly up from me as well.
FWIW, OCIO was one of the case studies that the VES Tech committee brought to the ASWF discussion as deep dive examples, so the ASWF structure was in a way biased to
Thumbs firmly up from me as well.
FWIW, OCIO was one of the case studies that the VES Tech committee brought to the ASWF discussion as deep dive examples, so the ASWF structure was in a way biased to
|
By
Sebastian Sylwan <syl...@...>
·
#1734
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
Whilst I agree with the reasoning, I think it is better to be clear
that there is no hard commitment for the ACES work to be moved under
ASWF, there was discussion about this at the ACES next BoF but
Whilst I agree with the reasoning, I think it is better to be clear
that there is no hard commitment for the ACES work to be moved under
ASWF, there was discussion about this at the ACES next BoF but
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1733
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
I didn't realize how much I wanted a mysterious council of alien overlords until you said we weren't getting one. ;)
That all sounds great, Larry. Thanks for the clarification. Within the ASWF
I didn't realize how much I wanted a mysterious council of alien overlords until you said we weren't getting one. ;)
That all sounds great, Larry. Thanks for the clarification. Within the ASWF
|
By
Sean Looper <sean....@...>
·
#1732
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
ASWF is not involved in the design or development per se.
It's *us* who avoids design by committee, if that's what we want.
In the process of being accepted, we (as a community) would need to
ASWF is not involved in the design or development per se.
It's *us* who avoids design by committee, if that's what we want.
In the process of being accepted, we (as a community) would need to
|
By
Larry Gritz <l...@...>
·
#1731
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
My only concerns are around the general benefits of having a single, production-focused sponsor (SPI in this case). As Larry alluded to, there are pros and cons to a single sponsor, the greatest con
My only concerns are around the general benefits of having a single, production-focused sponsor (SPI in this case). As Larry alluded to, there are pros and cons to a single sponsor, the greatest con
|
By
Sean Looper <sean....@...>
·
#1730
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
Two thumbs up. OCIO is a great candidate for the services and standardization that the AWSF will provide.
HP
Two thumbs up. OCIO is a great candidate for the services and standardization that the AWSF will provide.
HP
|
By
Haarm-Pieter Duiker <li...@...>
·
#1729
·
|
|
Considering OCIO --> ASWF
Thumbs up from me. Another reason I see is that in my mind the Academy's ACES config is now the de facto "reference implementation" for OCIO and it makes sense to have them living closer
Thumbs up from me. Another reason I see is that in my mind the Academy's ACES config is now the de facto "reference implementation" for OCIO and it makes sense to have them living closer
|
By
Steve Agland <sag...@...>
·
#1728
·
|
|
Re: Considering OCIO --> ASWF
I'm all for it. OCIO has become an essential part of the VFX world and
making sure its development will continue in a healthy fashion is
important, in my opinion.
I'm very happy to hear
I'm all for it. OCIO has become an essential part of the VFX world and
making sure its development will continue in a healthy fashion is
important, in my opinion.
I'm very happy to hear
|
By
Francois Lord <flord...@...>
·
#1727
·
|
|
Considering OCIO --> ASWF
Hey, everybody. We're thinking about applying to turn OpenColorIO governance over to the Academy Software Foundation (ASWF), and they are very enthusiastically seeking our application. Before we get
Hey, everybody. We're thinking about applying to turn OpenColorIO governance over to the Academy Software Foundation (ASWF), and they are very enthusiastically seeking our application. Before we get
|
By
Larry Gritz <l...@...>
·
#1726
·
|
|
ACES 1.1 config?
Any plans to update ACES config to version 1.1 (https://acescentral.com/t/aces-1-1-now-available/1420) in near future?
Thanks
Any plans to update ACES config to version 1.1 (https://acescentral.com/t/aces-1-1-now-available/1420) in near future?
Thanks
|
By
Shanky <shank...@...>
·
#1725
·
|
|
Re: SIGGRAPH 2018 - OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather
A big thank you from BlueBolt to all involved in the exciting developments announced last week at the BOF.
Please could someone with slack workspace admin rights send me an invite for:
A big thank you from BlueBolt to all involved in the exciting developments announced last week at the BOF.
Please could someone with slack workspace admin rights send me an invite for:
|
By
George Siddiqui <geo...@...>
·
#1724
·
|
|
Re: SIGGRAPH 2018 - OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather
Sean, you're very welcome to share. The v2 project is being run entirely in the open and we want the community to be informed and to participate.
I'm on my way back to Montreal ATM and would be happy
Sean, you're very welcome to share. The v2 project is being run entirely in the open and we want the community to be informed and to participate.
I'm on my way back to Montreal ATM and would be happy
|
By
Douglas Walker <doug_...@...>
·
#1723
·
|
|
Re: SIGGRAPH 2018 - OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather
Thanks Mike!
I'm particularly interested to discuss the ramifications of built in colour science transforms.
I suspect that well defined and static colourspaces won't be too controversial, but dynamic
Thanks Mike!
I'm particularly interested to discuss the ramifications of built in colour science transforms.
I suspect that well defined and static colourspaces won't be too controversial, but dynamic
|
By
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
·
#1722
·
|
|
SIGGRAPH 2018 - OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather
Hello OCIO community,
On Tuesday (August 14th) we held the OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather meeting at SIGGRAPH 2018 in Vancouver. Thanks to everyone who was able to attend, we had a great turnout!
The
Hello OCIO community,
On Tuesday (August 14th) we held the OpenColorIO Birds of a Feather meeting at SIGGRAPH 2018 in Vancouver. Thanks to everyone who was able to attend, we had a great turnout!
The
|
By
Michael Dolan <mich...@...>
·
#1721
·
|
|
Re: Digest for ocio...@googlegroups.com - 2 updates in 1 topic
Pretty sure there was a killer typo in Guarav’s illustration of tetrahedral interpolation though. There was supposed to be a second edition of that book (“Digital Color Imaging Handbook”, not
Pretty sure there was a killer typo in Guarav’s illustration of tetrahedral interpolation though. There was supposed to be a second edition of that book (“Digital Color Imaging Handbook”, not
|
By
Joseph Goldstone <jgold...@...>
·
#1720
·
|
|
Re: how to write .cube luts?
One source is Chapter 11 of Digital Color Handbook by Guarav Sharma, CRC Press 2003 —
“Efficient Color Transformationion Implementation”
Jim Houston
One source is Chapter 11 of Digital Color Handbook by Guarav Sharma, CRC Press 2003 —
“Efficient Color Transformationion Implementation”
Jim Houston
|
By
Jim Houston <jim.h...@...>
·
#1719
·
|
|
Re: how to write .cube luts?
I guess this means that the lut processor doesn't use (256 256 256) nomenclature when it outputs a color, so it doesn't have to perform a conversion to (256 256 256) by multiplying by 63. That would
I guess this means that the lut processor doesn't use (256 256 256) nomenclature when it outputs a color, so it doesn't have to perform a conversion to (256 256 256) by multiplying by 63. That would
|
By
michael...@...
·
#1718
·
|
|
Re: how to write .cube luts?
You don't round-to-nearest the index values, you floor them. Then the fractional parts are used for the interpolation. So for (6.3, 12.6, 18.9) the 2x2x2 cells used would be ({6|7}, {12|13}, {18|19})
You don't round-to-nearest the index values, you floor them. Then the fractional parts are used for the interpolation. So for (6.3, 12.6, 18.9) the 2x2x2 cells used would be ({6|7}, {12|13}, {18|19})
|
By
Dithermaster <dither...@...>
·
#1717
·
|
|
Re: how to write .cube luts?
I want to be sure I understand, so please advise me. As I understand it, when a lut receives an input value of (0.1 0.2 0.3), the processor looks to row_index (6*64*64 + 13*64 + 19) in the table to
I want to be sure I understand, so please advise me. As I understand it, when a lut receives an input value of (0.1 0.2 0.3), the processor looks to row_index (6*64*64 + 13*64 + 19) in the table to
|
By
michael...@...
·
#1716
·
|