|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
We always bake to sRGB and have the computers use that as their display profile. Nuke doesn't respect the actual display properties, so we don't want Photoshop to either.
In the past few years
We always bake to sRGB and have the computers use that as their display profile. Nuke doesn't respect the actual display properties, so we don't want Photoshop to either.
In the past few years
|
By
Brendan Bolles <bre...@...>
·
#1542
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
sounds similar to us then, do you explicitly assign a profile to the
displays in the OS or at least use the same profile from the display
when baking the ICC profile? This is the (ab)use I mentioned
sounds similar to us then, do you explicitly assign a profile to the
displays in the OS or at least use the same profile from the display
when baking the ICC profile? This is the (ab)use I mentioned
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1543
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
I'd say lift in the blacks is the most common, usually shifting their colors some direction in the process. This is exacerbated by us making profiles intended to be applied to a log image, so you
I'd say lift in the blacks is the most common, usually shifting their colors some direction in the process. This is exacerbated by us making profiles intended to be applied to a log image, so you
|
By
Brendan Bolles <bre...@...>
·
#1540
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
I'm intrigued by your comment of not good enough, when I compare, the differences are usually most visible as a slight lift in the blacks vs Nuke.
We set up with P3 monitors and generate profiles
I'm intrigued by your comment of not good enough, when I compare, the differences are usually most visible as a slight lift in the blacks vs Nuke.
We set up with P3 monitors and generate profiles
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1541
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Yes!!!
And aside from lacking the improvements you mention, I find the ICCs we're currently making to be pretty inadequate. If set up an ICC transformation and compare it to the original LUT, there
Yes!!!
And aside from lacking the improvements you mention, I find the ICCs we're currently making to be pretty inadequate. If set up an ICC transformation and compare it to the original LUT, there
|
By
Brendan Bolles <bre...@...>
·
#1539
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
<kevin.j....@...> wrote:
I really should avoid typing on small devices... "Our" in this context
refers to my day job and not OCIO .
Kevin
<kevin.j....@...> wrote:
I really should avoid typing on small devices... "Our" in this context
refers to my day job and not OCIO .
Kevin
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1538
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Lars,
Ah, now I feel a little silly for not recognising your email address!
I'm interested in improving the use of hdr/wcg/ACES* images in Adobe's products, so I'll bite too.
Or current (ab)use of
Lars,
Ah, now I feel a little silly for not recognising your email address!
I'm interested in improving the use of hdr/wcg/ACES* images in Adobe's products, so I'll bite too.
Or current (ab)use of
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1537
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Haha I don't think you could dangle such a tantalizing carrot in front of us and not expect us to bite ;)
Haha I don't think you could dangle such a tantalizing carrot in front of us and not expect us to bite ;)
|
By
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
·
#1534
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Count me as interested. It would be very helpful if the ICC generation capabilities of OCIO could handle HDR input ranges and wide color gamuts.
HP
Count me as interested. It would be very helpful if the ICC generation capabilities of OCIO could handle HDR input ranges and wide color gamuts.
HP
|
By
Haarm-Pieter Duiker <li...@...>
·
#1536
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Hi Kevin,
Well, I had planned to write a longer mail, but it got sent prematurely.
Here is a longer version:
Is there any interest in creating WCG/HDR-ready ICC profiles within OCIO?
The current
Hi Kevin,
Well, I had planned to write a longer mail, but it got sent prematurely.
Here is a longer version:
Is there any interest in creating WCG/HDR-ready ICC profiles within OCIO?
The current
|
By
Lars Borg <bo...@...>
·
#1535
·
|
|
Re: icc profile for photoshop
Whilst I'm don't think OCIO has perfect ICC support, I'm not sure
what you propose is even possible. Last time I read the ICC
specifications the only options for profile connection space are
L*a*b*
Whilst I'm don't think OCIO has perfect ICC support, I'm not sure
what you propose is even possible. Last time I read the ICC
specifications the only options for profile connection space are
L*a*b*
|
By
Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j....@...>
·
#1533
·
|
|
ACES 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 configs in the Sony repo
Hello OCIO-ers,
The ACES 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 configs were accepted into the main OCIO repo this weekend.
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO-Configs
The 1.0.3 config includes the latest 1.0.3
Hello OCIO-ers,
The ACES 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 configs were accepted into the main OCIO repo this weekend.
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO-Configs
The 1.0.3 config includes the latest 1.0.3
|
By
Haarm-Pieter Duiker <li...@...>
·
#1532
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
TravisCI supports OSX and Linux.
--
Larry Gritz
l...@...
TravisCI supports OSX and Linux.
--
Larry Gritz
l...@...
|
By
Larry Gritz <l...@...>
·
#1530
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
Absolutely pick the best thing, the only real benefit to what I am providing is I can give you exactly the environment that you want if its not provided by one of the cloudy tools. I don't believe any
Absolutely pick the best thing, the only real benefit to what I am providing is I can give you exactly the environment that you want if its not provided by one of the cloudy tools. I don't believe any
|
By
Ben De Luca <bde...@...>
·
#1531
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
I don't have any Jenkins experience, but Travis is pretty straightforward and I've really come to rely on it for my open source projects. It's a big boost to know before you merge something that it's
I don't have any Jenkins experience, but Travis is pretty straightforward and I've really come to rely on it for my open source projects. It's a big boost to know before you merge something that it's
|
By
Larry Gritz <l...@...>
·
#1528
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
@ben, though iId look into the other contributors opinion on TravisCI vs. Jenkins
@ben, though iId look into the other contributors opinion on TravisCI vs. Jenkins
|
By
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
·
#1527
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
That would be great if you have the cycles!
That would be great if you have the cycles!
|
By
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
·
#1526
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
On the CI front I can provide windows Linux and mac systems plus Jenkins if you want.
On the CI front I can provide windows Linux and mac systems plus Jenkins if you want.
|
By
Ben De Luca <bde...@...>
·
#1529
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
Whoops, try giving it another go
Whoops, try giving it another go
|
By
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
·
#1525
·
|
|
Re: OCIO - Path Forward
You probably have to move the file to your personal gmail. Google docs are not view-able outside of our domain either.
You probably have to move the file to your personal gmail. Google docs are not view-able outside of our domain either.
|
By
Deke Kincaid <dekek...@...>
·
#1524
·
|