|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
It didn't say other than "ocio_core_tests". Is there a log that's
written I can check?
Yeah, I saw the patch but wasn't really sure what it did :)
I've setup a version check as part of the process
It didn't say other than "ocio_core_tests". Is there a log that's
written I can check?
Yeah, I saw the patch but wasn't really sure what it did :)
I've setup a version check as part of the process
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#714
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Cool.
Which test is failing?
Yah, I looked into switching up to 0.2.7 recently and saw something similar myself. I assume you're not apply the yaml-cpp patch file? The issue is not yaml-cpp 0.2.7
Cool.
Which test is failing?
Yah, I looked into switching up to 0.2.7 recently and saw something similar myself. I assume you're not apply the yaml-cpp patch file? The issue is not yaml-cpp 0.2.7
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#711
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Ok, I've got good news and I've got bad news. I'll start with the good
since it's shorter :)
Good:
- I've gotten a successful build using the yaml-cpp system library.
- The current unit test works :)
Ok, I've got good news and I've got bad news. I'll start with the good
since it's shorter :)
Good:
- I've gotten a successful build using the yaml-cpp system library.
- The current unit test works :)
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#713
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
My preference is to keep using the bundled libs, by default, on all architectures (for the moment).
Currently, commercial app developers who want to ship OCIO along side their app (aka Foundry, etc)
My preference is to keep using the bundled libs, by default, on all architectures (for the moment).
Currently, commercial app developers who want to ship OCIO along side their app (aka Foundry, etc)
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#709
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Hmm... I never tried "hiding" options but I think in this case it
would be appropriate. Meaning I'll setup options such as
"USE_EXTERNAL_YAMLCPP" and
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Hmm... I never tried "hiding" options but I think in this case it
would be appropriate. Meaning I'll setup options such as
"USE_EXTERNAL_YAMLCPP" and
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#710
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Yeah that sounds great. I will leave it up to Jeremy to decide what the default is on UNIX.
I personally prefer what you are suggesting. As this means if you checkout and build the code
what ends up
Yeah that sounds great. I will leave it up to Jeremy to decide what the default is on UNIX.
I personally prefer what you are suggesting. As this means if you checkout and build the code
what ends up
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#715
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Makes sense, but to make sure I fully understand... Are you saying
that even on UNIX systems that bundled libraries should still be used
by default and have an option to
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Makes sense, but to make sure I fully understand... Are you saying
that even on UNIX systems that bundled libraries should still be used
by default and have an option to
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#708
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
I think it's important to support both bundled and unbundled libs. It's a necessary evil inside VFX shop software configurations. So you can use the bundled builds for the APPLE and WIN32 cases and
I think it's important to support both bundled and unbundled libs. It's a necessary evil inside VFX shop software configurations. So you can use the bundled builds for the APPLE and WIN32 cases and
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#712
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
I already have "make test" in my %check section of my rpmbuild spec
file. Is that what you mean? So far I haven't had any test failures in
any of my builds.
On a side note, unbundling yaml-cpp should
I already have "make test" in my %check section of my rpmbuild spec
file. Is that what you mean? So far I haven't had any test failures in
any of my builds.
On a side note, unbundling yaml-cpp should
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#707
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
I'll add the additional unit tests related to serialization.
But if you could hook the existing unit test process up to the build process, that would be appreciated. The big issue is making sure we
I'll add the additional unit tests related to serialization.
But if you could hook the existing unit test process up to the build process, that would be appreciated. The big issue is making sure we
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#702
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Works for me!
I can hack at the unbundling, but I'm probably not going to be much
help on the unit tests.
What's the approach there? I guess we could come up with as many
corner cases we can think
Works for me!
I can hack at the unbundling, but I'm probably not going to be much
help on the unit tests.
What's the approach there? I guess we could come up with as many
corner cases we can think
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#705
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Sure, sounds great. How about 'unbundled'? (not sure how spaces in branch names are handled).
-- Jeremy
Sure, sounds great. How about 'unbundled'? (not sure how spaces in branch names are handled).
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#701
·
|
|
Re: Handling of bundled apps/libraries for Linux distro packaging.
Hey guys, I was just wondering. Would it be appropriate at this point
to setup a branch for "unbundled libs"?
That way it could be worked on separately until its ready to merge.
Richard
Hey guys, I was just wondering. Would it be appropriate at this point
to setup a branch for "unbundled libs"?
That way it could be worked on separately until its ready to merge.
Richard
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#704
·
|
|
OFX Plugins ?
Hi Marie,
I also considered integrating OpenColorIO as a set of OFX plugins
in my compositor but in the end I decided it was better supporting it
directly in my app, so I didn't do much work on the
Hi Marie,
I also considered integrating OpenColorIO as a set of OFX plugins
in my compositor but in the end I decided it was better supporting it
directly in my app, so I didn't do much work on the
|
By
Esteban Tovagliari <rame...@...>
·
#706
·
|
|
OFX Plugins ?
Hello !
I was considering porting some OpenColorIO Nuke Nodes in OFX to use them in TuttleOFX (among others).
It reminds me that this subject was already discussed here (see below).
How are things
Hello !
I was considering porting some OpenColorIO Nuke Nodes in OFX to use them in TuttleOFX (among others).
It reminds me that this subject was already discussed here (see below).
How are things
|
By
Marie Fétiveau <m...@...>
·
#703
·
|
|
Python libraries not linked against on non windows platforms?
I just noticed when running rpmlint on my installation of OpenImageIO
that PyOpenImageIO can't find a lot of python symbols.
I looked in the cmake config for pyglue and noticed that the
I just noticed when running rpmlint on my installation of OpenImageIO
that PyOpenImageIO can't find a lot of python symbols.
I looked in the cmake config for pyglue and noticed that the
|
By
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
·
#700
·
|
|
OCIO 1.0.2 released
Version 1.0.2 (Nov 30 2011):
* 3D lut processing (cpu) is resiliant to nans
* Nuke OCIOFileTransform gains Reload buttons
* Installation on multi-lib *nix systems improved
* Installation
Version 1.0.2 (Nov 30 2011):
* 3D lut processing (cpu) is resiliant to nans
* Nuke OCIOFileTransform gains Reload buttons
* Installation on multi-lib *nix systems improved
* Installation
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#699
·
|
|
Re: Mari 1.4v1, now with OCIO support builtin
Congratulations!
-sean
By
Sean Looper <sean....@...>
·
#698
·
|
|
Mari 1.4v1, now with OCIO support builtin
Congrats to the Mari team for Shipping version 1.4v1, which features native OpenColorIO support!
http://thefoundry.s3.amazonaws.com/products/mari/releases/1.4v1/Mari_1.4v1_ReleaseNotes.pdf
They've
Congrats to the Mari team for Shipping version 1.4v1, which features native OpenColorIO support!
http://thefoundry.s3.amazonaws.com/products/mari/releases/1.4v1/Mari_1.4v1_ReleaseNotes.pdf
They've
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#697
·
|
|
Re: After Effects plug-in
Great! Yeah, I think we can leave the .xcodeproj and .vcproj files out
of the main distribution, but I'll keep them in my fork. I'm sure it's
possible to reverse engineer the projects into CMake, but
Great! Yeah, I think we can leave the .xcodeproj and .vcproj files out
of the main distribution, but I'll keep them in my fork. I'm sure it's
possible to reverse engineer the projects into CMake, but
|
By
Brendan Bolles <bre...@...>
·
#696
·
|