|
Re: Review: updated ociodisplay + ocioconvert
Agreed; now moved into 'apps'.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Agreed; now moved into 'apps'.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#356
·
|
|
Re: Review: Building/config related docs
Oh, and an observation: we now essentially have two masters for the
docs, the inline documentation, and the webpage version. My
inclination is to treat the git version as the master, and then to
Oh, and an observation: we now essentially have two masters for the
docs, the inline documentation, and the webpage version. My
inclination is to treat the git version as the master, and then to
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#355
·
|
|
Re: Review: Building/config related docs
Looks good to me.
These commits were all on the same topic, so I merged them into a
single checkin, "Documentation cleanup".
Thanks!
-- Jeremy
Looks good to me.
These commits were all on the same topic, so I merged them into a
single checkin, "Documentation cleanup".
Thanks!
-- Jeremy
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#354
·
|
|
Review: Building/config related docs
Added Python versions of most of the C++ usage examples (except the GPU one, as the Processor.getGpuLut3D method isn't exposed). Might not be terribly practical code, but it's a nice demo of the
Added Python versions of most of the C++ usage examples (except the GPU one, as the Processor.getGpuLut3D method isn't exposed). Might not be terribly practical code, but it's a nice demo of the
|
By
"dbr/Ben" <b...@...>
·
#363
·
|
|
Re: Review: Support python with --exec-prefix and registering Nuke viewer processes
Good point about the viewers. Thinking about it now, I wouldn't use the viewer-proc registration from the OCIO installation, as it'd be untweakable.. So, perhaps this would be more appropriate as part
Good point about the viewers. Thinking about it now, I wouldn't use the viewer-proc registration from the OCIO installation, as it'd be untweakable.. So, perhaps this would be more appropriate as part
|
By
"dbr/Ben" <b...@...>
·
#362
·
|
|
Re: GPUAllocation?
Yep this fixed it, and yeah I was just copying large sections of ociodisplay.
Ok thats good to know.
I've been using what ever the values are in the current spi-vfx profile just
to cutout any added
Yep this fixed it, and yeah I was just copying large sections of ociodisplay.
Ok thats good to know.
I've been using what ever the values are in the current spi-vfx profile just
to cutout any added
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#361
·
|
|
Re: GPUAllocation?
In your example, is the native type float linear?
Presuming so, I would check two things. In your gpu version, make
sure that the gpu texture buffer you're loading into is floating
point. You'll
In your example, is the native type float linear?
Presuming so, I would check two things. In your gpu version, make
sure that the gpu texture buffer you're loading into is floating
point. You'll
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#352
·
|
|
Re: Review: updated ociodisplay + ocioconvert
LGTM
I was thinking rather than having these in src/examples they should be src/apps as
they will be pretty useful things to have around.
.malcolm
LGTM
I was thinking rather than having these in src/examples they should be src/apps as
they will be pretty useful things to have around.
.malcolm
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#360
·
|
|
GPUAllocation?
While working on this ocio photoshop plugin I noticed a difference in the cpu vs gpu path.
Attached is a screenshot.
The image on top has been imported by the plugin already and processed on the
While working on this ocio photoshop plugin I noticed a difference in the cpu vs gpu path.
Attached is a screenshot.
The image on top has been imported by the plugin already and processed on the
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#359
·
|
|
Review: updated ociodisplay + ocioconvert
Issue:
http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/issues#issue/51
Commit:
http://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/commit/afe8a04366515a152197c345e0362bd6f5540c37
* Added makefile support for
Issue:
http://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/issues#issue/51
Commit:
http://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/commit/afe8a04366515a152197c345e0362bd6f5540c37
* Added makefile support for
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#351
·
|
|
Re: Review: Misc fixes
LGTM
.malcolm
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#353
·
|
|
Review: Misc fixes
3 unrelated commits.
1) Updated an error message in config loading.
http://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/commit/05b84bca45187f4f5f2c8117ce0bb2a553a36f16
2) GLSL shader doesnt use invalid
3 unrelated commits.
1) Updated an error message in config loading.
http://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/commit/05b84bca45187f4f5f2c8117ce0bb2a553a36f16
2) GLSL shader doesnt use invalid
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#350
·
|
|
Re: Review: Support python with --exec-prefix and registering Nuke viewer processes
Done.
I've checked this into master, with a few changes:
* Nuke_INSTALL_PATH is now NUKE_INSTALL_PATH (all caps)
I know the old value predates this checkin, but now that it's
publicized I figure we
Done.
I've checked this into master, with a few changes:
* Nuke_INSTALL_PATH is now NUKE_INSTALL_PATH (all caps)
I know the old value predates this checkin, but now that it's
publicized I figure we
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#348
·
|
|
Re: Review: Support python with --exec-prefix and registering Nuke viewer processes
It all looks great other than the ocio_viewer as I would need to disable this for our install.
I think the nuke nodes should only be registered as part of the ocio project initialisation.
Viewer
It all looks great other than the ocio_viewer as I would need to disable this for our install.
I think the nuke nodes should only be registered as part of the ocio project initialisation.
Viewer
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#349
·
|
|
Re: Review: Support python with --exec-prefix and registering Nuke viewer processes
Thanks for the commits!
Look great at first glance. (I'll run it all this afternoon to make
sure it works multi-platform, etc). I like all the nuke cleanup, very
sensible.
My one concern is I'm
Thanks for the commits!
Look great at first glance. (I'll run it all this afternoon to make
sure it works multi-platform, etc). I like all the nuke cleanup, very
sensible.
My one concern is I'm
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#344
·
|
|
Review: Support python with --exec-prefix and registering Nuke viewer processes
I've made a few minor changes, partly to familiarise myself with the
code, partly to say thanks for open-sourcing this extremely useful
project!
First change - there was a hardcoded Nuke path, which
I've made a few minor changes, partly to familiarise myself with the
code, partly to say thanks for open-sourcing this extremely useful
project!
First change - there was a hardcoded Nuke path, which
|
By
"dbr/Ben" <dbr....@...>
·
#343
·
|
|
Re: Review: Exposed gamma control on Nuke OCIODisplay node
done.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
done.
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#342
·
|
|
Re: Review: Exposed gamma control on Nuke OCIODisplay node
perfect
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#347
·
|
|
Re: Review: Exposed gamma control on Nuke OCIODisplay node
Spaces in knob names have always worried me. How about an underscore
in the knob name?
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
Spaces in knob names have always worried me. How about an underscore
in the knob name?
<malcolmh...@...> wrote:
|
By
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
·
#341
·
|
|
Re: Review: Exposed gamma control on Nuke OCIODisplay node
I would do both just for consistency.
I would do both just for consistency.
|
By
Malcolm Humphreys <malcolmh...@...>
·
#346
·
|