Date
1 - 19 of 19
1.1.0 Release
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
Hello all, With the help of our lovely contributors, we have just set up the 1.1.0 release branch. This is currently regarded as a Release Candidate since the official 1.1.0 tag has not been assigned yet. We are looking to the community to take a look at this release candidate and provide feedback before the version is officially locked off. We will be looking to have input before the following Friday (Jan 12 2018). Pending feedback, we will look to lock off the version after this date. All input and opinions are welcomed and appreciated. Thanks! SC |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Trying to do a test build on Fedora Rawhide but I'm getting an error: + /usr/bin/cmake -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/include -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/lib64 -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/etc -DSHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr/share -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON -DOCIO_BUILD_STATIC=OFF -DOCIO_BUILD_DOCS=ON -DOCIO_BUILD_TESTS=ON -DOCIO_PYGLUE_SONAME=OFF -DUSE_EXTERNAL_YAML=TRUE -DUSE_EXTERNAL_TINYXML=TRUE -DUSE_EXTERNAL_LCMS=TRUE ../ -- The C compiler identification is GNU 7.2.1 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 7.2.1 -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Detecting C compile features -- Detecting C compile features - done -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done -- Detecting CXX compile features -- Detecting CXX compile features - done -- Setting Build Type to: RelWithDebInfo -- Setting Namespace to: OpenColorIO -- Exec prefix not specified, defaulting to /usr -- Use Boost Ptr: OFF -- Setting python bin to: python Python library: /usr/lib64/python2.7/config/libpython2.7.so -- Setting EXTDIST_BINPATH: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/bin -- Setting EXTDIST_PYTHONPATH: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/lib64/python2.7/site-packages -- Found TinyXML: /usr/lib64/libtinyxml.so -- TinyXML version: 2.6.2 -- External TinyXML will be used. -- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found version "1.4.0") CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:415 (message): A required package was not found Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:593 (_pkg_check_modules_internal) CMakeLists.txt:255 (pkg_check_modules) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Am I missing something? I can't see what's actually wrong... Thanks, Richard |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Ok, so I changed to yaml-cpp 0.5.x (was still using 0.3.x) and got past cmake, now: /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/src/core/Lut1DOp.cpp:192:14: error: 'void OpenColorIO::v1::{anonymous}::Lut1D_Nearest(float*, long int, const OpenColorIO::v1::Lut1D&)' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] void Lut1D_Nearest(float* rgbaBuffer, long numPixels, const Lut1D & lut) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors Thanks, Richard |
|
Patrick Hodoul <patric...@...>
Using newer gcc version (i.e. 7.2.1), you are facing new warnings. https://github.com/imageworks/OpenColorIO/pull/488/commits/598f11d995a73d950ab85abeef1f6c2d1a15a6d9 Patrick. On Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 9:29:37 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
|
|
Patrick Hodoul <patric...@...>
Please have a look to PR #498 to have the standalone fix (for gcc 5.4.0) On Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 9:37:50 PM UTC-5, Patrick Hodoul wrote:
|
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Ok, next error, setuptools is built thinking it needs /usr/lib but installs to /usr/lib64 (as it should) and then it gets confused. Side question: Why do we have to build a bundled setuptools instead of using what's available, at least on linux? Thanks, Richard creating build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/dist.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/script template (dev).py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/depends.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/package_index.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/archive_util.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/compat.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/ssl_support.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/py27compat.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/sandbox.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/py26compat.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/version.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/py24compat.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/__init__.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/site-patch.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/extension.py -> build/lib/setuptools copying setuptools/script template.py -> build/lib/setuptools creating build/lib/_markerlib ... [ 31%] Performing install step for 'setuptools' cd /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/src/core_tests && /usr/lib64/ccache/c++ -DOCIO_SOURCE_DIR=/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1 -DOCIO_UNIT_TEST -DOpenColorIO_STATIC -DUSE_SSE -I/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/export -I/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/export -I/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/ext/oiio/src/include -I/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wextra -Wshadow -Wconversion -Wcast-qual -Wformat=2 -msse2 -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -DTIXML_USE_STL -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -o CMakeFiles/ocio_core_tests.dir/__/core/GpuShaderUtils.cpp.o -c /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/src/core/GpuShaderUtils.cpp cd /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/docs/setuptools-prefix/src/setuptools && PYTHONPATH=/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/lib64/python2.7/site-packages: python setup.py install --prefix=/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist ... TEST FAILED: /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ does NOT support .pth files error: bad install directory or PYTHONPATH You are attempting to install a package to a directory that is not on PYTHONPATH and which Python does not read ".pth" files from. The installation directory you specified (via --install-dir, --prefix, or the distutils default setting) was: /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ and your PYTHONPATH environment variable currently contains: '/home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/ext/dist/lib64/python2.7/site-packages:' Here are some of your options for correcting the problem: * You can choose a different installation directory, i.e., one that is on PYTHONPATH or supports .pth files * You can add the installation directory to the PYTHONPATH environment variable. (It must then also be on PYTHONPATH whenever you run Python and want to use the package(s) you are installing.) * You can set up the installation directory to support ".pth" files by using one of the approaches described here: Please make the appropriate changes for your system and try again. |
|
Patrick Hodoul <patric...@...>
double-checked using the ubuntu 16 & gcc 5.4.0 docker image and setuptools is working fine. On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 10:23:15 AM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
|
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
I think that's because ubuntu uses debian's scheme instead of /usr/lib{,64} like RPM based distros. Either way, there's still the question about why the system installed setuptools isn't used... Thanks, Richard |
|
Patrick Hodoul <patric...@...>
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 4:40:41 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
|
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Patrick Hodoul <patric...@...> wrote:
Yeah, I've thought about it. I actually added most of the USE_EXTERNAL... stuff when I first got OCIO in Fedora but I have far fewer free cycles these days. Thanks, Richard |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Ok, so I "fixed" it by adding --install-dir to all the python external projects but now I run into this: [ 61%] Building pdf doc cd /home/build/rpmbuild/OpenColorIO/BUILD/OpenColorIO-RB-1.1/build/docs/build-latex && /usr/bin/pdflatex OpenColorIO.tex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.17 (TeX Live 2016) (preloaded format=pdflatex) restricted \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (./OpenColorIO.tex LaTeX2e <2016/03/31> Babel <3.9r> and hyphenation patterns for 3 language(s) loaded. (./sphinxmanual.cls Document Class: sphinxmanual 2009/06/02 Document class (Sphinx manual) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/report.cls Document Class: report 2014/09/29 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo kpathsea: Running mktextfm cmr10 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map source abbreviation for cmr10. /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/mktexnam: Need to update ? mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input cmr10 This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182818 (TeX Live 2016) (preloaded base=mf) kpathsea: Running mktexmf cmr10 ! I can't find file `cmr10'. <*> ...e:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input cmr10 Please type another input file name ! Emergency stop. <*> ...e:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input cmr10 Transcript written on mfput.log. grep: cmr10.log: No such file or directory mktextfm: `mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input cmr10' failed to make cmr10.tfm. kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log. ! Font OT1/cmr/m/n/10=cmr10 at 10.0pt not loadable: Metric (TFM) file not found . <to be read again> relax l.54 \normalsize ? And it pauses there waiting for input, which is bad of course since it should be non-interactive. Thanks, Richard |
|
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
Richard, have you tested Patrick's PR for the GCC fixes? I'm looking to release today and don't want to slot in unnecessary commits to the release, they have already been merged to master so will show up in OCIO 1.1.1 down the road. Let me know you thoughts On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...> wrote:
|
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Sean Cooper <se...@...> wrote:
Yes, this is with the PR already being applied as a patch, I appear to only be having issues with building the documentation. I can disable that but I would hate to release a new package without the documentation when the previous one had it... Is it just the extended documentation that I would be missing? Thanks, Richard |
|
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
What issues are you having with the documentation? On Jan 12, 2018 12:44 PM, "Richard Shaw" <hobbe...@...> wrote:
|
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Sean Cooper <se...@...> wrote:
In my previous email I pasted the output from building the pdf documentation. For some reason pdflatex is getting to an interactive prompt which is of course bad when trying to build a package :) Thanks, Richard |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
I'm getting it figured out... It's missing texlive packages but I don't want to install EVERYTHING because there's tons of packages, so I'm having to find what's missing one at a time and keep trying to build. Thanks, Richard |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Ok, I spoke too soon, this doesn't look like a missing package problem: ! Package babel Error: You haven't specified a language option. See the babel package documentation for explanation. Thanks, Richard |
|
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
Crap, never mind again... Richard |
|
Sean Cooper <se...@...>
Version 1.1.0 has just been released and is located on the "RB-1.1" branch for long-term support. Please continue to evaluate and we will release patches as necessary. Thanks! On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...> wrote:
|
|