converting The Right Way™ from linear -> custom log -> monitor
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
Hi!toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
So you shouldnt have to muck around with any of the specific underlying Transforms (you mention the log transform, and the file transform). The typical use case with OCIO is that these are all abstracted away inside the OCIO configuration, and that clients of the library treat the color transformation stack as a 'black box'. (The reason we expose these *.Transforms at all in python is that so it's possible to script the creation of Configs using the python API.)
I.e., if you wanted to convert pixels from colorspace "A" to colorspace "B"...
config.getProcessor("A","B") would suffice. (either the names, or roles)
The client would *not* need to know whether the definitions of A and B involved 1-D LUTs, 3-D LUTs, log converts, etc.
So can you confirm your facility already has a show-level OCIO config with the colorspace definitions already setup? (If you're using Katana or Nuke or Mari with OCIO functionality, it's likely you already have one setup). Also note that I see you're calling OCIO.GetCurrentConfig(). That reads from $OCIO, so if you're not seeing a warning in the shell then you're probably good to go.
The one exception where you DO need to use a Transform in a client app is the DisplayTransform, which is the simplest way to create a "canonical viewing transform".
So say you wanted to convert colors, from log space, to something suitable for image display. As this is for image display, the DisplayTransform is most appropriate:
config = OCIO.GetCurrentConfig()
t = OCIO.DisplayTransform()
t.setInputColorSpaceName( "NAME OF YOUR LOG COLORSPACE OR ROLE_COMPOSITING_LOG ")
t.setDisplay( config.getDefaultDisplay() )
t.setView( config.getDefaultView( config.getDefaultDisplay() ) )
And then you get the processor,
processor = config.getProcessor(t)
And then you use the processor to process pixels.
For extra credit... Note that if you're drawing a gradient and having the user pick colors, a log space gradient - while much better than scene-linear - may not be ideal. I.e., you may find that the distribution of colors along the gradient is not to your liking. One of the OCIO pre-defined roles is ROLE_COLOR_PICKER. The intent is that this would be the alias to the color space most suitable for use in a color-picker. (The Katana color picker makes use of this role, for example). And the default OCIO configs we publish have this defined in a manner suitable for color picking.
Let me know if you have any further questions along these lines. This color picker stuff is both complicated, and fun. :)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:12 AM, <sor...@...> wrote:
I'm writing a fairly simple Python based color-managed color picker. OCIO seems like a good tool for the job, and it's an opportunity for me to learn a new API. Beyond hacking something together that "just works" I'd like to understand The Correct Way To Do Things According To The OCIO Python API. At the moment I'm not sure how my problem fits into the OCIO abstraction of roles, Displays, ColorSpaces, Transforms, Processors, Looks, Views, and Configs.