Date
1 - 5 of 5
yaml-cpp
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
We're looking at 0.3.0 (which maintains the current yaml API). I talked to the developer, and the new API is a bit too in flux / untested to want to jump to it in the short term.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I've got a branch of OCIO where I've been playing with 0.3.0:
This will probably become a pull request once I get the appropriate unit tests in, and work out an issue with regards to null token.
The good part is that the ocio yaml patch file goes away (other than the enabling of -fPIC)
-- Jeremy
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...> wrote:
I've been following the discussion for yaml-cpp on the upstream
tracker and had a question.
Is it yet known if OCIO is going to use the 0.3.0 or the new 0.5.0 version?
The reason I ask is that I need to know to which version to petition
the Fedora packager to update. (That's a lot of "to"'s)
Thanks,
Richard
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...> wrote:
Fedora maintainer update to 0.3.0. I'll make sure that -fPIC makes it
into the build.
I think that's the last MAJOR obstacle to getting OCIO in Fedora. If I
remember correctly (assuming they pass the future unit tests) that the
versions of tinyxml and LCMS already in Fedora are ok?
Thanks,
Richard
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786528
We're looking at 0.3.0 (which maintains the current yaml API). I talkedThanks for the quick reply! I just submitted a bug[1] to request the
to the developer, and the new API is a bit too in flux / untested to want to
jump to it in the short term.
I've got a branch of OCIO where I've been playing with 0.3.0:
https://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/tree/yaml
This will probably become a pull request once I get the appropriate unit
tests in, and work out an issue with regards to null token.
The good part is that the ocio yaml patch file goes away (other than the
enabling of -fPIC)
Fedora maintainer update to 0.3.0. I'll make sure that -fPIC makes it
into the build.
I think that's the last MAJOR obstacle to getting OCIO in Fedora. If I
remember correctly (assuming they pass the future unit tests) that the
versions of tinyxml and LCMS already in Fedora are ok?
Thanks,
Richard
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786528
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
I think that's the last MAJOR obstacle to getting OCIO in Fedora.
I'm willing to consider all future obstacle minor, if you are! :)
If I
remember correctly (assuming they pass the future unit tests) that the
versions of tinyxml and LCMS already in Fedora are ok?
That's my memory too.
-- Jeremy
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786528
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...> wrote:
while to update my patch) but it now builds and pass the current tests
so that's promising.
Thanks,
Richard
We're looking at 0.3.0 (which maintains the current yaml API). I talkedI build my own yaml-cpp 0.3.0 packages tried your branch (it took me a
to the developer, and the new API is a bit too in flux / untested to want to
jump to it in the short term.
I've got a branch of OCIO where I've been playing with 0.3.0:
https://github.com/jeremyselan/OpenColorIO/tree/yaml
while to update my patch) but it now builds and pass the current tests
so that's promising.
Thanks,
Richard