Date
1 - 3 of 3
yaml-cpp 0.5.0
Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...>
I think the plan is to stick with the existing API, until there is a
compelling reason to upgrade.
Is there any advantage to bumping up?
-- Jeremy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
compelling reason to upgrade.
Is there any advantage to bumping up?
-- Jeremy
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...> wrote:
I noticed that yaml-cpp 0.5.0 was released with the new API. Is there
a plan to move to the new API or stick with the 0.3.0 API?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Richard Shaw <hobbe...@...>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Jeremy Selan <jeremy...@...> wrote:
yaml-cpp it doesn't really matter. The problem would be if another
package wanted/needed 0.5.0 then we would have to decide if it was
practical for all packages to use the same version of yaml-cpp or if
we would have to come up with a parallel installable package (no
namespace or file conflicts) which depending on upstream can be easy
or hard.
Richard
I think the plan is to stick with the existing API, until there is aNot that I know of. And as long as nothing else in Fedora wants
compelling reason to upgrade.
Is there any advantage to bumping up?
yaml-cpp it doesn't really matter. The problem would be if another
package wanted/needed 0.5.0 then we would have to decide if it was
practical for all packages to use the same version of yaml-cpp or if
we would have to come up with a parallel installable package (no
namespace or file conflicts) which depending on upstream can be easy
or hard.
Richard