Date   

Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Chas Jarrett
 

To add a thought about the slide deck;
The "Next Steps" roadmap slide at the end could use a title to make clear it's the ORI roadmap. And the background colour scheme makes it tough to read the foreground text (none of the text is easy to read).  Otherwise it's coming together. 

If anyone has thoughts about the content please let us know. 

Best, Chas. 

On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 22:20, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
@ John,  please do that now if you can. The Press release is supposed to be locked by eod today. (Not launching till next week) 

-Erik

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:05 PM John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:
One request - can I request a quick trademark knock out search? Want to be sure there isn't anything super problematic.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

"The Open Review Initiative"  (ORI) feels pretty good to me and, it appears we have Chas as a second +1.

Any dissenters?  I'll consider this official unless someone objects before 5pm today.

Thanks for the ideation on this, I think we landed in a good place.

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:23 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361
--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

John Mertic
 

Done and escalated. Hope to hear something Monday.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 4:20 PM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
@ John,  please do that now if you can. The Press release is supposed to be locked by eod today. (Not launching till next week) 

-Erik

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:05 PM John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:
One request - can I request a quick trademark knock out search? Want to be sure there isn't anything super problematic.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

"The Open Review Initiative"  (ORI) feels pretty good to me and, it appears we have Chas as a second +1.

Any dissenters?  I'll consider this official unless someone objects before 5pm today.

Thanks for the ideation on this, I think we landed in a good place.

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:23 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361
--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic
--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Erik Strauss
 

@ John,  please do that now if you can. The Press release is supposed to be locked by eod today. (Not launching till next week) 

-Erik

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:05 PM John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:
One request - can I request a quick trademark knock out search? Want to be sure there isn't anything super problematic.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

"The Open Review Initiative"  (ORI) feels pretty good to me and, it appears we have Chas as a second +1.

Any dissenters?  I'll consider this official unless someone objects before 5pm today.

Thanks for the ideation on this, I think we landed in a good place.

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:23 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361
--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

John Mertic
 

One request - can I request a quick trademark knock out search? Want to be sure there isn't anything super problematic.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

"The Open Review Initiative"  (ORI) feels pretty good to me and, it appears we have Chas as a second +1.

Any dissenters?  I'll consider this official unless someone objects before 5pm today.

Thanks for the ideation on this, I think we landed in a good place.

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:23 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361
--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Erik Strauss
 

Hi All,

"The Open Review Initiative"  (ORI) feels pretty good to me and, it appears we have Chas as a second +1.

Any dissenters?  I'll consider this official unless someone objects before 5pm today.

Thanks for the ideation on this, I think we landed in a good place.

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:23 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Upcoming Events #cal-summary

Group Notification <noreply@...>
 

Review and Approval WG discussion Upcoming Events

ASWF Open Source Days Review and Approval Working Group Update

When:
Monday, August 8, 2022, 1:50pm to 2:30pm
(GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles

Where:
Fairmont Waterfront, Ballroom C, Vancouver CA

Organizer: Erik Strauss erik.strauss@...

View Event


Review and Approval Working Group meeting

When:
Tuesday, September 6, 2022, 9:00am to 10:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles

Where:
https://zoom.us/j/91349652143

Organizer: Erik Strauss estrauss@...

Details:
Agenda doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JBh0wVLGLPHIQS7n05iq20ix2HlSEBX9NrIF2sPiMHY/edit

Wiki: https://wiki.aswf.io/display/PRWG/Playback+And+Review+Working+Group

Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/91349652143

Meeting ID: 913 4965 2143 One tap mobile +13126266799,,91349652143# US (Chicago) +16465588656,,91349652143# US (New York)

Dial by your location +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) 877 369 0926 US Toll-free 855 880 1246 US Toll-free +1 438 809 7799 Canada +1 587 328 1099 Canada +1 647 374 4685 Canada +1 647 558 0588 Canada +1 778 907 2071 Canada +1 204 272 7920 Canada 855 703 8985 Canada Toll-free Meeting ID: 913 4965 2143 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/adFK4myrnX

View Event


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Chas Jarrett
 

Love an acronym. 

Works for me. 

C. 

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 23:21, Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel
--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Erik Strauss
 

I think there is a future where what we define as "media" today (typically image files or movies) is not the only type of data these systems will display, (gLTF, USDz anyone?) but I don't have a concise word for "digital content" that feels good, and to Daniel's point I don't think folks will confuse the intent of the initiative under the auspices of the mission of the foundation. it might be better to leave it less defined since we don't really know what the shape of the data we will be reviewing in 5+ years is.

Open Review Initiative  "ORI" is consistent with our fondness for short typable three letter acronyms at least.  

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:11 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Daniel Flehner Heen
 

As we're under the wings of the ASWF I'm not too concerned about people not getting what we are reviewing.


On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:10 AM Sean Wallitsch <shidarin@...> wrote:
OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel



--
-Daniel


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Sean Wallitsch
 

OTOH we’re back to not sounding like we’re about Media.

I like where this is headed though

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:09 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Daniel Flehner Heen
 

beat me to it Erik :)


On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:09 AM Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
I like where this is going! Thank you all for contributing.

I'm more fond of " The Open Review Initiative" than "The Open Playback Initiative" as playback seems too narrow of a scope considering the existing feature sets of the projects we are incorporating, and is only one aspect of review. 

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:59 PM Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
+1 for "Initiative" or "Project" or something to indicate that it isn't a single product.

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
Pixar Studio Tools Story/Editorial/VR Previs Tech Lead
joshm@...

On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:50 PM, Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:

Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic



--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Daniel Flehner Heen
 

I like "Review" better than "Playback" as it sounds more open for subprojects.
 

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:05 AM Cottalango Leon <loorthu@...> wrote:
I like Open Review Initiative

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361



--
-Daniel


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Erik Strauss
 

I like where this is going! Thank you all for contributing.

I'm more fond of " The Open Review Initiative" than "The Open Playback Initiative" as playback seems too narrow of a scope considering the existing feature sets of the projects we are incorporating, and is only one aspect of review. 

-Erik

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:59 PM Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
+1 for "Initiative" or "Project" or something to indicate that it isn't a single product.

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
Pixar Studio Tools Story/Editorial/VR Previs Tech Lead
joshm@...

On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:50 PM, Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:

Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic



--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Cottalango Leon
 

I like Open Review Initiative


On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:50 PM Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:
Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Joshua Minor
 

+1 for "Initiative" or "Project" or something to indicate that it isn't a single product.

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
Pixar Studio Tools Story/Editorial/VR Previs Tech Lead
joshm@...

On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:50 PM, Chas Jarrett <ckj@...> wrote:

Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic



--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Chas Jarrett
 

Yes I tend to agree. 
The Open Review Initiative
The Open Playback Initiative
C. 


On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 22:38, Joshua Minor <joshm@...> wrote:
Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic

--
Chas Jarrett
Senior VFX Supervisor - DNEG
+447974385361


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Joshua Minor
 

Our project names that start with "Open" help to emphasize the open source aspect. To me, "Review and Approval" sounds more like a business process tracking system because it doesn't indicate what is being reviewed or approved. Is it fair to say that the project(s) are about reviewing "media"? So maybe OpenMediaReview or something like that could work?

---
Joshua Minor (he-him)
OpenTimelineIO Technical Steering Committee Chairperson



On Jul 28, 2022, at 2:15 PM, John Mertic <jmertic@...> wrote:

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

John Mertic
 

I would +1 the common naming here - I think for better discoverability somehow tying it back to the industry would be helpful and make it stand out more on web searches. It also would be helpful if at some point there would be value in pursuing a trademark and/or defending the mark if there are competitive projects that emerge.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:12 PM Daniel Flehner Heen <flehnerheener@...> wrote:
I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 

--
Thank you,

John Mertic
Director of Program Management - Linux Foundation
ASWF, LF Energy, and Open Mainframe Project
jmertic@...
+1 234-738-4571
Schedule time with me at https://meetings.hubspot.com/jmertic


Re: WG Project naming [last call!!]

Daniel Flehner Heen
 

I like the suggested name. My only concern is that it's going to be a bit hard to google for.
You might get a few hits on other RNA related sites...
But since I have not better alternative I vote in favor (if I have a vote that is.)

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 20:02 Erik Strauss <erik.strauss@...> wrote:
Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 


WG Project naming [last call!!]

Erik Strauss
 

Hi All,

We've got to settle on a name for the umbrella TSC entity to satisfy our legal requirements, and have something to call ourselves in press releases for Siggraph etc...

So far the only candidate is "RnA Project" 

This is a last call for alternatives or votes in favor of or vehemently against the above.

I'd like to make the decision by EOD tomorrow so we can enable the PR teams to move ahead with their work.

Please chime in now if you have suggestions, or votes in favor/against the "RnA Project" naming.

Thanks,
-Erik 

21 - 40 of 302