Chris Foster <chri...@...>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Wormszer <worm...@...> wrote:
Actually my error was strchr returning a char* instead of a const char*.Yeah, I believe that's fixed in the patch.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Wormszer <worm...@...> wrote:From what I can tell, the latest visual studio has a native
unordered_map implementation, but my preference for boost is just
because it's consistent across all platforms.
Yep.Does the gcc build really generate no warnings, i guess it must not with
This is to be expected really; all the different compilers haveI just built oslcomp and I get about 3800 warnings, this is displaying all
somewhat different ways of checking for suspicious code, and the
compiler authors have different standards about what they consider