RSL and OSL both are able to overload functions by return type.
So, do the terminology purists out there think that this makes it "polymorphic" or merely "overloaded"?
-- lg
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Iliyan wrote:
I think one of the reasons for this extensive explanation was meant to make the point that functions cannot be overloaded only by return type, in contrast to RSL :) This, along with many other "restrictions" of OSL, makes sense, I'd argue.
On Feb 1, 7:54 pm, Larry Gritz <l...@...> wrote:
I believe you are correct. Polymorphism should refer to types, what I was talking about is really "overloading."
