Date
1 - 3 of 3
fixes for gcc-4.4.2 (issue573042)
cliffo...@...
On 2010/03/16 23:20:46, clifford.stein wrote:
One important note: I'm getting a failure in the 'logic' test. It
appears that 'oslc' built with gcc442 is creating different .oso code
compared to an 'oslc' built with gcc342. Larry has offered to look into
it once this patch is committed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/573042/show
One important note: I'm getting a failure in the 'logic' test. It
appears that 'oslc' built with gcc442 is creating different .oso code
compared to an 'oslc' built with gcc342. Larry has offered to look into
it once this patch is committed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/573042/show
Larry Gritz <l...@...>
Minor oversight on my part: Cliff, please don't commit the change until we get a signed CLA from Chris. I've sent it to him as well as posted it in the "downloads" section of the google code web site.
Sorry for the mixup.
-- lg
On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Chris Foster wrote:
Larry Gritz
l...@...
Sorry for the mixup.
-- lg
On Mar 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Chris Foster wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:20 AM, <cliffo...@...> wrote:--Description:LGTM2. Good to see the patch I posted a while back wasn't too moldy
Here are some fixes to get OSL to compile with gcc-4.4.2. Some of these
fixes I shamelessly lifted from Chris.F's patch from a while back. It's
mostly pretty straightforward.
to be slightly helpful :)
Larry Gritz
l...@...